The Buddha From Dolpo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
**[[The Buddha From Dolpo:Chapter One—The Life of the Buddha from Dolpo|Chapter One—The Life of the Buddha from Dolpo]] | **[[The Buddha From Dolpo:Chapter One—The Life of the Buddha from Dolpo|Chapter One—The Life of the Buddha from Dolpo]] | ||
**[[The Buddha From Dolpo:Childhood and Early Education|Childhood and Early Education]] | **[[The Buddha From Dolpo:Childhood and Early Education|Childhood and Early Education]] | ||
**[[The Buddha From Dolpo:Studies at the Great Monastery of Sakya|Studies at the Great Monastery of Sakya]] | |||
**[[The Buddha From Dolpo:The Move to Jonang|The Move to Jonang]] | |||
**[[The Buddha From Dolpo:Raising Mt. Meru and Revealing the Zhentong View|Raising Mt. Meru and Revealing the Zhentong View]] | |||
**[[The Buddha From Dolpo:The Initial Reception of the Zhentong Teachings|The Initial Reception of the Zhentong Teachings]] | |||
[[Category:Digital Research Library]][[Category:The Buddha From Dolpo]] | [[Category:Digital Research Library]][[Category:The Buddha From Dolpo]] | ||
[[Studies at the Great Monastery of Sakya|Read]] | [[Studies at the Great Monastery of Sakya|Read]] | ||
[[The Move to Jonang|Read]] | [[The Move to Jonang|Read]] | ||
[[Raising Mt. Meru and Revealing the Zhentong View|Read]] | [[Raising Mt. Meru and Revealing the Zhentong View|Read]] | ||
[[The Initial Reception of the Zhentong Teachings|Read]] | [[The Initial Reception of the Zhentong Teachings|Read]] | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 12 November 2005
- List of Illustrations
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part One—The Life and Teachings of the Omniscient Dolpopa
The New Jonang Translation of the Kalacakra* Tantra and the Vimalaprabha*
Years of Retreat and Teaching
Invitation to China by the Yüan Emperor Toghon Temür
Changes in the Jonang Leadership and the Beginning of the Journey to Lhasa
Teachings in Central Tibet and the Return to Tsang
The Aborted Meeting with Budön Rinchen Drup
The Last Months at Jonang
Chapter Two—A Historical Survey of the Zhentong Tradition in Tibet
This advice by the Omniscient Dolpopa should be kept as the essential point in our hearts: "If buddhahood will be reached merely as a result of having heard the word 'Buddha-nature,' what need to mention what will happen from actualizing it by means of faith and devotion, and meditating upon it? Therefore, compassionate experts should teach it even though they may lose their lives, and so forth, and those who strive for liberation should seek it out and listen to it even though they must cross through a great pit of fire." —Jamgön Kongdrul1
Very little is known about the early Tibetan proponents of philosophical points of view which would later come to be known as Zhentong (gzhan stong ). According to Lhey Gyaltsen, many persons with partial realization of the teachings of definitive meaning had appeared in Tibet before the fourteenth century, most of them serious meditators, but no one until Dolpopa had mastered all the teachings of definitive meaning found in the various scriptures, treatises, and esoteric instructions, and then formulated that realization into a coherent philosophical system2 Taranatha* traces a transmission lineage for what he refers to as "the instructions on the view of the Zhentong Middle Way," as well as a separate lineage for the transmission of the Kalacakra* teachings passed down in the Jonang tradition.3 The first of these lists is concerned with the transmission of the practical instructions which epitomize the intentions of all the sutras* and commentaries of the Third Turning of the Dharma Wheel. This lineage is primarily traced
Page 42
through Maitreya and the Indian brothers Asanga* and Vasubandhu, who are considered to be the originators of the doctrine, but another list is also given for the transmission from Nagarjuna* .4 This text may be considered a record of the names of teachers who taught the Zhentong view based upon the teachings of the Mahayana* scriptures and commentaries. Taranatha's* second text, concerned with the lineage of the Kalacakra* as transmitted in the Jonang school, may be considered a record of the names of teachers who taught the Zhentong view based upon the teachings found in the tantras, and specifically as articulated in the Kalacakra* tantra and the related literature. Examples of the teachings of only one Tibetan master in each of these lineages before the time of Dolpopa are available at the present time.
The Zhentong Tradition in Tibet before Dolpopa
Dolpopa and the Zhentong View
The Zhentong Tradition after Dolpopa
Chapter Three—The Doctrine of the Buddha from Dolpo
Existence and nirvana* are not identical, but like a shadow and the sun. —Bhagavan* Avalokitesvara* 1
The title alone of Dolpopa's The Great Calculation of the Doctrine Which Has the Significance of a Fourth Council (Bka' bsdu bzhi pa'i don bstan rtsis chen po ) would have been enough to rankle those who were opposed to his interpretations of Buddhist Doctrine. In Tibet it was universally accepted that there had been three great councils (bka' bsdu ) in India for the purpose of gathering and accurately preserving the teachings of the Buddha after his final nirvana* .2 Dolpopa's audacious claim that his text served as a fourth such council would obviously have provoked incredulous reactions among many of his contemporaries. That he anticipated certain objections is clear from the following comments at the end of his autocommentary to The Fourth Council :
Having realized that the Doctrine of the Buddha remains in a superior, a middling, and an inferior [form, it is realized that] the superior is the Krtayuga* Dharma, which is the witness and authority. The middling is the Tretayuga Dharma and the inferior is the Dvaparayuga* Dharma. Those two are not witnesses. This realization by the great experts who stand guard over the Doctrine is very important.
To establish the path of perfect view, meditation, and conduct after cleansing the flawless Doctrine of flaws which have
Page 80
been mixed in, and contamination which has been imposed by the flawed intellects of ordinary persons, is also the purpose of a council. There were three councils before, and this is the fourth. It is also a great calculation of the Doctrine.3 It is called impartial and unbiased because all the faithful respect, pure vision, expressions of disagreement, appeals,. love, compassion, and so forth, remain impartial and unbiased, without falling into any prejudice.
Objection: While it is known that many arhats [destroyers of the enemy] gathered for the previous councils, here the gathering is just to destroy [your] enemies.
[Reply:] In the sublime Krtayuga* teachings there are many thousands of profound quotations by the great arhat, the Blessed One, the Buddha, which very clearly present the meaning of this. Since those [quotations] are the same as the [actual presence of] the great arhat, this has been compiled according to his tradition.
Future compilers please also do likewise, and if there is disagreement in regard to the interpretation of the quotations, please use the autocommentaries of the Buddha himself as witnesses.4
In addition to clarifying the meaning of the title of his text, these remarks also touch upon the first major point raised by Dolpopa in The Fourth Council itself. In this work, and many of his earlier compositions as well, Dolpopa speaks of a fourfold division of the Buddhist teachings according to four eons (yuga ). Basing himself upon the teachings of the Vimalaprabha * , Dolpopa mentions two sets of four eons (yuga ), the first of which is the greater, referring to the quality of the eons which make up a cosmic age (kalpa ), while the lesser set refers to the quality of the different periods of the Buddhist teachings.5 In the autocommentary he states his criteria for this classification, and makes it obvious that he is speaking of a doxographical scheme in regard to the eons of the Doctrine. This has recently been noted by M. Kapstein, who has said that Dolpopa was "allocating philosophical doctrines to 'aeons' according to purely dogomatic criteria."6 According to Dolpopa, the teachings of the perfect Krtayuga are those which apply directly to the truth just as it is, whereas the teachings which belong to the Tretayuga,
Page 81
Dvaparayuga* , and Kaliyuga are progressively contaminated and filled with flaws, due to the nature of the individuals who have composed them. Thus the Krtayuga teachings are the only ones which should be regarded as valid testimonies to the enlightened intentions of the Buddha.7
This classification of the historical degeneration of the Buddhist teachings is indeed found in full form in the Vimalaprabha * , primarily in the section of commentary upon verses 22 and 23 of the Lokadhatupatala* of the Kalacakra * tantra .8 Budön's annotations to these passages make it clear that Dolpopa was not here making any innovative interpretations of the original treatise.9 What is less clear is what the Vimalaprabha * and Dolpopa both consider to be the teachings of the Krtayuga. As indicated by quotations found throughout his writings, Dolpopa certainly considered the Krtayuga Dharma to include many, if not all of the highest tantras, as well as The Trilogy of Bodhisattva Commentaries, The Ten Sutras * on the Buddha-nature, The Ten Sutras * of Definitive Meaning ,10 and the works of Maitreya, Nagarjuna* , Vasubandhu, Asanga, Naropa* , and Saraha. AS Kapstein has mentioned, Dolpopa seems to have considered Ãrya Vimuktisena, Haribhadra, Yasomitra* , and other late Indian masters to represent the Tretayuga.11
It will become obvious in the translation of The Fourth Council in part 2 that Dolpopa identified his own tradition with the teachings of those scriptures and writers which he viewed as truly portraying the Krtayuga tradition. This was also a motivating factor behind his wish to redefine what had until his time been accepted as the orthodox lines of scriptural interpretation in Tibet.
Emptiness of Self-Nature and Emptiness of Other
A Redefinition of Cittamatra* and Madhyamaka
Two Approaches to Enlightenment
Part Two—Texts in Translation
Figure 2.1
Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen.
Detail of a fifteenth-century painting of the
Kalacakra* mandala* .
Henss Collection, Zurich. (Photo by Michael Henss)
Introduction to the Translation of A General Commentary on the Doctrine
The Supplication Entitled A General Commentary on the Doctrine
Introduction to the Translation of The Fourth Council
The Great Calculation of the Doctrine Which Has the Significance of a Fourth Council
Notes
Introduction
Chapter 1. The Life of the Buddha from Dolpo
Chapter 2. A Historical Survey of the Zhentong Tradition in Tibet
Chapter 3. The Doctrine of the Buddha from Dolpo
Introduction to the Translation of A General Commentary on the Doctrine
The Supplication Entitled A General Commentary on the Doctrine
Introduction to the Translation of The Fourth Council
The Great Calculation of the Doctrine Which Has the Significance of a Fourth Council
Bibliography
European Language Sources
Tibetan and Sanskrit Sources
Index
293